Saturday, April 6, 2013

Any guesses as to who trumps Palestinians in libeling Israel?

Leo Rennert..
American Thinker..
06 April 13..

Of all the journalistic horrors perpetrated by the New York Times against Israel, this one takes the cake and gets the gold star. Let me set the scene:

Amid widespread tensions and clashes in the West Bank, an IDF post near a settlement was attacked by Palestinians, who lobbed Molotov cocktails and hurled stones at Israeli troops. Both such weapons can have lethal effects. Responding to the attack, Israeli soldiers returned fire and killed two assailants.

The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights said Israeli forces killed two Palestinian "civilians" in the West Bank. The boys, it reported, had thrown "stones and empty bottles at Israeli soldiers." Empty bottles? Unlikely. Bottles in these cases are usually turned into Molotov cocktails. But at least a Palestinian source made clear that there had been an attack on the IDF post.

Now, let's see how the New York Times reported this incident, which fueled Palestinian rage amid talk of a third intifada. Under these circumstances, one would especially expect an accurate report by the Times to set the record straight about who did what to whom.


Instead, Jodi Rudoren, the Jerusalem bureau chief of the Times, posted a dispatch on the paper's website on April 5 that tells readers that unrest was stoked by "the killing by Israeli soldiers of two teenagers who approached an army post during a demonstration."

And this is the sum total of her description of this incident: two Palestinian teenagers just ambled toward an IDF post. They were just taking a walk during a demonstration, and suddenly, for no reason at all, they were murdered by the IDF. No stones, no Molotov cocktails. Nothing that would justify live fire by IDF troops.

It's bad enough that Mahmoud Abbas and other Palestinian officials have been on a relentless propaganda campaign against Israel, blaming it for the death of a Palestinian inmate who actually had received medical treatment since his cancer was diagnosed in February. But even they have not resorted to such depths of inciteful, provocative misreporting as displayed by Rudoren and the Times.


Updates throughout the day at http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com. If you enjoy "Love of the Land", please be a subscriber. Just put your email address in the "Subscribe" box on the upper right-hand corner of the page.Twitter updates at LoveoftheLand as well as our Love of the Land page at Facebook.
.

3 comments:

  1. There is so much distortion of the truth vis-à-vis Israel. I find the same thing among some television journalists too. The first question I always ask is 'how does Israel serve herself breaking the Ceasefire'? I am personally tired of Palestine's 'endless tales of woe' etc etc. A number of Palestinians sold their land for high sums of money, settled elsewhere. An interesting under cover report on British television a while back.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jodi Rudoren is a disgrace as a journalist and as a JEW.
    Traitor,liar,distorter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd say she should be ashamed of herself but I'm guessing she is past the ability to feel shame! Man, when the palestinians have an American jew (small j on purpose) doing their dirty work for them, we've sunk to a new low, as a society!

      p.s. I'm a pro-Israel Gentile.

      Delete