Honest Reporting/Backspin..
12 March '13..
It must have been fatiguing for Max Fisher to look at so many photos of injured Palestinians and Israelis during last year’s Gaza conflict.
The Washington Post blogger argued in November, and now again, that it doesn’t matter who killed baby Omar.
Does assigning blame for Mishrawi’s tragic death, awful as it may be, offer us any real insight into who holds the blame for 60 years of fighting? And is partitioning blame really going to serve either side particularly well?
It’s difficult to see how knowing whose rocket or missile killed Mishrawi would resolve the larger questions for which that debate is a proxy: responsibility for continuing the long-term conflict, for sparking the latest round of fighting in November, and for the Israeli and Palestinian civilians who suffer as a result. But these are notoriously thorny debates. As with so many protracted geopolitical conflicts, neither side comes out looking as angelic or demonic as its partisans might wish. In many ways, something as isolated as a single photo of a wounded or killed child offers a purer, cleaner, lower-risk way to talk about issues too messy to engage with directly. They’re a great way to win arguments, but not necessarily to end them.
Yes, war is messy.
Yes, the photo is one small facet of a long, wearying conflict.
But if news is the proverbial “first draft of history,” it behooves Big Media to get the facts right. That’s the best way to head off a lot of needless arguments.
It’s the passage of time that allows us to see events in a larger historical context. I can relate Fisher’s aching desire to see the big picture pronto, but what he’s looking for is the product of history, not news. News is about the hard facts you learn in Journalism 101: who, what, where, when, why and how. The what-it-all-means questions are posed to fallible Big Thinkers we refer to as pundits, wonks, and talking heads.
Unfortunately, the demonization of Israel takes place in the here and now when the world jumps to unfortunate conclusions about photos such as Jihad Mishawari’s tragedy.
As far as the first draft of history is concerned, the number of people who saw the image in November and associated with Israeli responsibility will never match the number of people who are now aware of the real story. The damage to Israel can’t be undone.
But what lessons can the Washington Post and Big Media learn for the future?
Link: http://honestreporting.com/washington-post-it-doesnt-matter-who-killed-baby-omar/
Updates throughout the day at http://calevbenyefuneh.
.
Posts
nice post
ReplyDeleteThe killing of an 11-month baby is itself a human tragedy. Seeing the killing in war times from that perspective decreases indeed the importance of who did what. But the issue is not what The Washington Post is trying to do NOW after the truth was revealed i.e.deriving the audience attention from who did what after it has focused pretty well on the Israeli responsibility for the killing when it first reported the incident. So the issue is The Washington Post's for taking part in reporting a false accusation to public without checking facts. Media, The Washington Post & BBC in this case, must have learnt that in the world of reporting/Journalism, It Does Matter Who Killed Baby Omar.
ReplyDeleteI agree 1000%; only when they realize they have made a mistake which amounted to spreading a defamatory blood libel, that would set off pogroms resulting in the killings of thousands in the Middle Ages, and much more recently, too,---a mistake reflecting on their own lack of professionalism, and even journalistic ability, does it suddenly "not matter" who killed the baby. It certainly mattered when they first erroneously blamed Israel, and it still does for all those who don't know, and may never know, what really happened.
ReplyDelete