Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Roth - If rocket attacks are no big deal for us, what should we expect our friends to say and do?

Frimet/Arnold Roth..
This Ongoing War..
01 May '12..

Regular readers of our postings know that we try to record all or at least most of the rocket firings like the one that happened last night and that almost no one heard about - see "30-Apr-12: Rocket crashes into southern Israel again tonight". These impact the lives and homes of hundreds of thousands of Israelis. There is a relentless and explosive ongoing war conducted against us by the terrorist forces arrayed against us outside our borders and within them. And yet, in many cases, ours is one of a mere handful of English-language reports of such rocket attacks.

That's a situation that - given the effects of this kind of warfare on Israel's non-aggressive civilians and the phenomenal scale of the weaponry held by the terrorists - is appalling.

In a thoughtful analysis entitled "Where 8,000 Rocket Launches Are Not a Casus Belli" [online here], journalist, commentator and JINSA Fellow Evelyn Gordon wonders about the wisdom of Israel's extraordinary passivity in the face of those attacks on its people and territory.


Here's an extract:

The most chilling comment I've seen on the mid-March surge of violence from Gaza, when terrorists fired 300 rockets at Israel in four days, was made almost three weeks earlier. The rocket fire had been steadily increasing, indicating that the deterrent effect of Israel's 2009 war in Gaza was fading, and Israel Defense Forces officers were discussing whether another large-scale operation in Gaza was needed. "The debate within the IDF," The Jerusalem Post reported, "is whether it needs to wait for a successful attack by Gaza terrorists - be it a rocket attack that causes casualties or a successful cross border attack - or if the sporadic rocket fire is enough of a justification to launch an operation today." Think about that: Palestinian terrorists have fired more than 8,000 rockets at Israel since its mid-2005 pullout from Gaza, along with thousands of mortar shells; even in 2011, a "quiet" year, there were 680 rocket and mortar launches, almost two a day. A million residents of Israel's south live in permanent fear, punctuated every few months by more intensive bouts of violence that, like the one in mid-March, close schools for days and empty workplaces of parents, who must stay home with their kids. In Sderot, the town closest to Gaza, an incredible 45% of children under six have been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, as have 41% of mothers and 33% of fathers; these statistics will presumably be replicated elsewhere as the rockets' increasing range brings ever more locales under regular fire. In any other country, such relentless shelling would unquestionably be a casus belli. But Israel's army was seriously debating whether this alone justified military action, or whether it had to wait until the rockets caused a mass-casualty incident. This is the rotten fruit of a government policy that for years dismissed the rockets as a minor nuisance for reasons of petty politics...

Gordon quotes the famous dictum of then-Vice-Prime Minister Shimon Peres - currently Israel's much-honored president - accusing Israelis from the Knesset podium of "stoking hysteria" about the rockets and demanding "What's the big deal?"

For the Israelis living in the exposed towns and communities of the south, it was not only a big deal but a harbinger of what was and is in store for the rest of us, and we don't mean just Israelis. But that's another analysis.

Evelyn Gordon points out that when you have prominent Israeli voices wondering why people are making a fuss of what's being done to Israelis, people and politicians outside Israel will quickly get the message and the fuss will go away. That's pretty much exactly where we are today: a mere handful of the tens of thousands of lethal rockets held by the terrorist regimes who control our northern (Lebanese) and southern (Gazan) borders fire a handful of rockets indiscriminately in the general direction of anything Jewish or Israel, as they do daily, and it goes unreported and unremarked.

Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Dan Kurtzer told The Jerusalem Post Washington expected "a very serious Israeli response to the first act of [post-pullout] violence coming out of Gaza" and "was very surprised there was no reaction to the first rocket, second rocket and 15th rocket." But Sharon insisted the rockets were "not really that bad." Thus "all of a sudden," Kurtzer said, "people got acclimated to the idea that there can be rocket fire."

Gordon offers a concrete suggestion for what to do since no one but Israel's citizens are actually thinking about what to do since only we bear the burden of the outcome and thus only we have the obligation and the right:

Israel should begin warning relentlessly that if the rocket fire doesn't stop completely - as opposed to the current "norm" of one or two launches a day - it will be forced to reoccupy Gaza. That might actually galvanize constructive international action, such as pressure on Egypt to crack down on arms smuggling to Gaza and terrorist bases in Sinai. But if not, it would at least underscore how seriously Israel takes the rocket threat, since most Israelis have no more desire to reoccupy Gaza than they do to start a war with Iran. And it would thereby prepare world opinion for the operation if and when it ultimately takes place.

The whole Evelyn Gordon article is surely worth your attention.

Link: http://thisongoingwar.blogspot.com/2012/05/1-may-12-if-rocket-attacks-are-no-big.html

Updates throughout the day at http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com. If you enjoy "Love of the Land", please be a subscriber. Just put your email address in the "Subscribe" box on the upper right-hand corner of the page. Twitter updates at LoveoftheLand 
.

No comments:

Post a Comment