Jewish refugees, Czechoslovakia, 1946. Israel made room for them. |
16 September '11
http://fresnozionism.org/2011/09/palestine-no-refuge-for-palestinians/
The very first thing Israel did as a state was to do its absolute best to bring Jewish refugees everywhere home.
European refugees from the Holocaust, Jews expelled from Arab countries with little more than the clothes on their backs, Jews in danger in Ethiopia — every Jew who needed a home was given one, despite the enormous cost, the lack of food and housing, and the precarious existence of the Jewish state.
Now that the Palestinian Arabs are, or think they are, on the verge of statehood, what do they plan to do for the 4.5 million or so people who claim Palestinian refugee status?
After all, statehood is supposed to provide a solution for the “plight of the Palestinians” and part of their plight has always been said to be the horrible circumstances of the ‘refugees.’ So surely one would expect that a top priority for the new state of ‘Palestine’ would be to help these people: give them citizenship, homes, education, jobs, etc. Get them out of camps and help restore their self-respect.
But in keeping with the Fundamental Axiom of Arab Priorities™ which says that “Hurting Jews is Always More Important than Helping Arabs,” that is not the case.
Thanks to Elder of Ziyon for bringing this to our attention:
BEIRUT: Palestinian refugees will not become citizens of a new Palestinian state, according to Palestine’s ambassador to Lebanon.
From behind a desk topped by a miniature model of Palestine’s hoped-for blue United Nations chair, Ambassador Abdullah Abdullah spoke to The Daily Star Wednesday about Palestine’s upcoming bid for U.N. statehood.
The ambassador unequivocally says that Palestinian refugees would not become citizens of the sought for U.N.-recognized Palestinian state, an issue that has been much discussed. “They are Palestinians, that’s their identity,” he says. “But … they are not automatically citizens.”
This would not only apply to refugees in countries such as Lebanon, Egypt, Syria and Jordan or the other 132 countries where Abdullah says Palestinians reside. Abdullah said that “even Palestinian refugees who are living in [refugee camps] inside the [Palestinian] state, they are still refugees. They will not be considered citizens.”
Abdullah said that the new Palestinian state would “absolutely not” be issuing Palestinian passports to refugees.
Neither this definitional status nor U.N. statehood, Abdullah says, would affect the eventual return of refugees to Palestine. “How the issue of the right of return will be solved I don’t know, it’s too early [to say], but it is a sacred right that has to be dealt with and solved [with] the acceptance of all.” He says statehood “will never affect the right of return for Palestinian refugees.” – Daily Star, Lebanon
In other words, the refugees will continue to be stateless, living on the UN (mostly US) dole, in ‘refugee camps’, as they have for the past three generations, until they can finally fulfill their purpose — to overrun the Jewish state.
So not only will ‘Palestine’ be a racist, antisemitic, apartheid state, it will not lift a finger to help its own people. They want a ‘right of return’ to Israel, but they will not get one to Palestine!
Tell me again why the UN will vote for Palestinian statehood, please.
If you enjoy "Love of the Land", please be a subscriber. Just put your email address in the "Subscribe" box on the upper right-hand corner of the page.
.
Let us be entirely clear about the Palestinians, the Palestinians exist for only one reason, to exterminate Israel and the Jewish People.
ReplyDeleteEvery other Palestinians issue, non negotiable demand, or even negotiable demand including but not limited to, sovereignty, statehood, the '67 borders, the refugees, Jerusalem, Jewish settlements, the occupation, are all simply ruses, red herrings to draw attention away from the real and despicable Palestinian goal of the destruction of Israel and the Jewish People.
Look, if the Palestinians were in any way interested in a peaceful conclusion to their differences with Israel, they would have had their state decades ago, with Jerusalem as their capital and the '67 borders to boot, not to mention that Israel would have taken in hundreds of thousands of so called Palestinian refugees as a concession to make peace. Yes hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have already been granted citizenship and residence in Israel as a result of the Oslo Accords and so called "family unification" agreements with the Palestinians, and up to two hundred thousand Palestinians, including armed terrorists, were allowed to enter the Palestinian occupied territories as part of the Oslo Accords.
And by the way, all these humanitarian gestures that Rabin and Peres signed off on in the Oslo Accords were supposed to entice the Palestinians to make peace while all it did was sharpen their appetite to make even more demands.
The Palestinians only want to destroy Israel and the Jewish People, nothing less will satisfy them.
Shabbat Shalom,
Hey Ken,
ReplyDeleteQuick tip for the future. Please don't refer to Judea and Samaria as " Palestinian occupied territories ". At the very very best they are disputed territories, as it should be understood by everyone that it is Israeli territory as decided in San Remo in 1920 with the instrument of the British mandate for Palestine. Most of the world doesn't know this, or has conveniently forgotten.
BY E,M Jordan is Pales St
ReplyDeleteNo doubt that the comment No one 100% is right and I just want to add there is one Palestinian Arab State and that is Jordan with majority of Arab Palestinian population and with vote nor without vote in UN the road is open to Jordan for entire Arab whom they claiming that they are Arab Palestinian and do not forget that the Jews already have compromised the biggest part of their ancestress land Jordan to Arab Palestinian and now they should take of chance and will establish their State in Jordan other that they will stay back and will lose more time.