The Rubin Report
01 September '11
http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/2011/09/why-supporting-unilateral-palestinian.html
Marwan Barghouti, leader of the Fatah West Bank grassroots' (Tanzim) group and under a life sentence in an Israel prison, has said that if the United States vetoes a unilateral Palestinian statehood proposal at the UN, there will be massive riots. To underline the point, he called such a decision a “historic, deadly mistake.”
When he says, “deadly,” he means it. Indeed, Barghouti, the leader of the Fatah grassroots' (Tanzim) organization on the West Bank, is in prison precisely because he organized massive deadly riots after the Palestinian Authority (PA) rejected a compromise peace with Israel that would have given them a state in 2000. In other words, they’re intransigent and then start a war when they don’t get everything they want.
It’s the basic tactic in the terrorist playbook: Give me everything I want so I can better destroy you in the long run or I will kill you in the short-run.
And it is encouraged by the basic tactic often used by Western governments: We feel your pain, understand that you are a victim, and will give you as much as possible. Those concessions are rejected and then more are demanded.
This doesn’t make sense to most Western observers: Aren’t the Palestinians desperate for a state and to end a terrible “occupation?” In fact, though, Israel pulled completely out of the Gaza Strip six years ago this month and the Palestinian Authority (PA) has now governed almost all West Bank Palestinians for the last 17 years.
In fact, the PA is not in a hurry to negotiate a deal for several reasons.
First, the moderates in the PA are very weak compared to the radicals who still run Fatah, its ruling party. Second, the PA is still competing with revolutionary Islamist Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip in a race to prove its militancy. Third, almost nothing has been done to prepare the Palestinians for a compromise peace and two-state solution alongside Israel. Finally, most Palestinian leaders still think that total victory and Israel’s extinction is possible, desirable, and just. Many in the West—whether intentionally or not—encourage that last belief by hostile policies and beliefs regarding Israel.
That doesn’t mean Israel is willing to give everything or that its policies are perfect. But the mood in Israel today, and for the last dozen years or more, is ready—even eager—for a lasting, stable two-state solution. The differences over borders and other issues can be argued at the negotiating table and are possible to resolve in a genuine exchange of compromises and concessions on both sides.
But since 1993, the Palestinian Authority has made several agreements with Israel. In exchange for being handed control over the Gaza Strip and much of the West Bank; billions of dollars in aid; the supply of weapons; the return of tens of thousands of Palestinians to these territories; and many other benefits, the PA promised to do various things in return. These include an end to incitement to kill Israelis; stopping terrorism; and negotiating in good faith for a comprehensive agreement.
Since Hamas attacked Israel with rockets and mortars setting off a war in December 2008, the PA has refused to negotiate with Israel. When President Barack Obama in September 2009, announced he wanted to hold direct talks in Washington, the PA refused. In 2010, when Israel, at the request of President Barack Obama, froze all construction on settlements for nine months, the PA again wouldn’t talk.
Instead, the PA came up with a new strategy, why negotiate a compromise agreement with Israel when it could go to the UN and be handed an independent state without having to make any concessions? No need to reach a deal with Israel over borders, refugees, east Jerusalem, security guarantees, agreeing that the conflict is completely finished, or recognizing Israel as a “Jewish state” (the Palestinian constitution says that Palestine will be an Arab and Muslim state), just get a vote in the General Assembly!
This, of course, is not a solution to the conflict but a way of avoiding a negotiated solution to the issue. It is not a way to end the conflict but to ensure that the conflict continues and more lives are lost on both sides.
The underlying problem is that the PA and its allies among Arab and Muslim-majority states want to wipe Israel off the map. If they want a Palestinian state on the basis of an agreement with Israel that goal could be accomplished within months. But because such a peace arrangement would block the advance toward the ultimate goal it is undesirable.
But suppose that the UN did agree to recognize Palestine as a state, meaning that the Security Council approved and the General Assembly voted to do that? Immediately, the state of Palestine would have no incentive to reach a deal with Israel. Instead, it could do things like trying to import weapons from abroad; allow Arab armies to send forces onto its soil, and even allow cross-border terrorist attacks on Israel. In the Gaza Strip, Hamas, a terrorist group that openly calls for genocide against Israel and all Jews, would be in effect part of an internationally recognized government.
If Israel then responded to any attack, the state of Palestine would go to the UN, declare Israel to be the unprovoked aggressor, and the automatic majority in the General Assembly would back it up no matter what the facts. The possibility of real negotiations, much less a peace treaty, would be set back for years. And in a region increasingly heading toward revolutionary Islamism in many places, a deteriorating security situation overall plus this new development would bring war.
Far from helping the situation, then, the UN gambit is likely to lead to less peace, no hope of a negotiated settlement, and more bloodshed.
This article is published today in the Ottawa Citizen.
Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center, editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal, and Middle East editor and featured columnist at PajamasMedia http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/. His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader (seventh edition), The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy in the Middle East (Wiley), and The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan). GLORIA Center site is http://www.gloria-center.org.His articles published originally outside of PajamasMedia are at http: www.rubinreports.blogspot.com
If you enjoy "Love of the Land", please be a subscriber. Just put your email address in the "Subscribe" box on the upper right-hand corner of the page.
.
Posts
The Palestinian Authority, the PLO, and Hamas never intended to settle with Israel peacefully. All of these groups, and most of the Arab and Islamic world have in fact been constantly at war to destroy Israel and try to carry out a genocide against the Jewish People in one form or another with Israel since their founding.
ReplyDeleteThis simple fact, that the Arabs want to destroy Israel and mass murder all the Jews, and only this fact is what has been so frustrating to Israel and the West in trying to find a peace settlement between Palestinians and Israel. Although many in Israel and the West still try to either deny it or delude themselves that there is some way to moderate it these murderous Palestinian goals, many more are now dropping their rose colored glasses and concluding that the Palestinians and the Arab world will never stop trying to destroy Israel.
Yet there is a slim ray of hope and light in this overall dark picture, and that is that the Arabs are harming themselves with their stubborn rejection of Israel far more than they are harming Israel.
Israel goes from strength to strength while the Arabs sink deeper and deeper into their self created mire of ignorance, poverty, hunger, and violence.
So, so true, both your article and Ken's comment. "Palestine" was invented by Arafat, Nasser, and other Arab leaders in the mid-1960s in order to portray the "Palestinians" as an oppressed people struggling for freedom against a tyrannical foreign ruler ... this posture had a very powerful resonance among Western "liberals" during an era of history in which indigenuous peoples all over the world were rising up and throwing off their colonial masters.
ReplyDeleteThe real goal of the Arab world, of course, has always been the eradication of Israel and the Israeli people. After being repeatedly defeated in formal military encounters, Arab leaders hit upon this concept of "Palestine" as a way to continue to be allowed by the international community to attack Israel and kill Jews ... and now their terrorists would be regarded as freedom fighters who were engaged in a noble struggle for independence and self-determination, instead of the cowardly sociopathic murderers that they actually were, and still are.
Arafat never wanted statehood. Not only because it would have meant an end to Arab terrorism against Israel, but for personal reasons: As the leader of an oppressed people struggling for independence, he was a star: Invited to speak all over the world, appearing before the UN, hobnobbing with powerful international leaders, his every word and action followed by world media, in command of massive financial resources. He wasn't about to give up all that to become the leader of a tiny, impoverished third-world nation with few resources. In 2000 Barak made him the best offer the "Palestinians" have ever received from Israel, even ceding East Jerusalem, and Arafat STILL turned it down.
I wish more people in the Western world would wake up and see the truth for what it really is. The majority of Westerners who support the "Palestinians" probably don't have the slightest idea of what is really happening on the ground in Israel. They take their perceptions of the conditions that obtain in their own country and culture and try to impose them on a foreign region whose military, political, religious, ideological, psychological, and emotional realities are all radically different from their own.
Every time Israel gives up land, the Arabs see it not as good will or generosity, but as weakness and a signal to press for more. Violence against Israel only increased when the IDF left Gaza and the West Bank. The Arabs will never change, and they will never give up their real goal, which is the absolute destruction of Israel by any means possible.