Sunday, July 18, 2010

U.S. Official Acknowledges Regional Threats to Israel Not Linked to Resolution of Palestinian Conflict


JINSA
17 July '10

On the day an article stressing close U.S.-Israel security ties under President Obama appeared in The Washington Post, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs Andrew J. Shapiro appeared before a crowd of Middle East policy analysts to affirm the message. He was reticent to address mounting concerns that the partnership is in decline, and specifically did not address whether the administration had declined to deliver weapons contracted for during the Bush Administration, declaring that America’s security relationship with Israel is “broader, deeper and more intense than ever before.” But his message was mixed as he chastised the Netanyahu government’s commitment to the peace process, saying “a deeper political commitment” to the process by Israel is needed.

Speaking Friday at the Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle East Policy, Shapiro appeared to reveal a bit of Obama Administration policy confusion. On the one hand, he stressed the importance the White House placed on ensuring that Israel has the capability to counter rocket threats posed by Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran, but on the other hand, diminished Israel's very drive to do that. "Bolstering Israel's security against the rocket threat will not by itself facilitate a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," he said. And "A two-state solution will not in and of itself bring an end to these threats."

(Read full post)

If you enjoy "Love of the Land", please be a subscriber. Just put your email address in the "Subscribe" box on the upper right-hand corner of the page.
.

2 comments:

  1. The point is no concessions Israel could make will bring about peace to the Middle East. One wonders how well the Obama Administration comprehends this. It appears, not nearly enough to refrain from chastising Israel for the lack of a real peace partner on the other side.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It would seem that the habitual doing by rote will continue to trump those brief moments of realization, that their accomplishment is failure.

    ReplyDelete