24 August '12..
In Israel’s internal debate for and against attacking Iran’s nuclear program, the basic dividing line is between those who put their trust in the United States/international community to take care of the problem and those who do not.
President Shimon Peres—supposed to be a figurehead who keeps out of politics—recently told Israel’s Channel 2 TV that “it’s clear to us that we can’t do it alone…. It’s clear to us we have to proceed together with America. There are questions about coordination and timing, but as serious as the danger is, this time at least we are not alone.”
But what if America were to shy off from attacking Iran, or decide it was not in its interest? Not to worry, said Peres: “I am convinced this is an American interest. I am convinced [President Obama] recognizes the American interest and he isn’t saying this just to keep us happy. I have no doubt about it, after having had talks with him.”
And former Mossad chief Meir Dagan became an international media hit by saying an Israeli attack would be “the stupidest thing I have ever heard.” A few months ago he and some colleagues, in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, went so far as to carefully advise the international community how to use sanctions to put a full stop to Iran’s program.
Although Peres is never quiet, Dagan at least has been quiet lately. Is he having second thoughts? One doesn’t know, but there would be good reasons for him to have them.
On Wednesday AP reported that Iran’s Asian oil-buying markets are keeping it economically afloat—and more—despite the sanctions. “When Iran welcomes world leaders to a world gathering [of the Non-Aligned Movement] next week,” AP notes, “few will get a grander reception than India’s prime minister.” That’s because, while
[o]il purchases by India, China and South Korea—which decided this week to resume Iranian imports—have not covered Tehran’s losses…they have given Iran a critical cushion that brings in tens of millions of dollars in revenue each day and means that Iran has dropped only one ranking, to stand as OPEC’s third-largest producer.
The report goes on to say that “The U.S. has pressed hard for Iran’s top customers—China, India, Japan and South Korea—to scale back on crude imports, with some success…. But Washington cannot push its key Asian trading partners too fast or too aggressively and risk economic rifts.”
It then quotes an expert who says: “Despite Western sanctions…China and Japan will remain major importers of Iranian crude oil and so will India.”
So much for sanctions? At least, it seems clear that Israel shouldn’t be putting its life on the line out of a totally unwarranted assumption that they’ll work.
Meanwhile the International Atomic Energy Agency—which is supposed to make sure rogue states don’t develop nuclear weapons—is resuming talks with Iran on Friday. The ostensible goal is to gain access to Parchin, the site 20 miles southeast of Tehran where—according to Western assessments—Iran has been carrying out explosives tests relevant to nuclear weapons.
The problem is that since last November, when the IAEA fingered Parchin as a problematic site, Iran has never granted the agency access to it.
And on Wednesday IAEA director-general Yukiya Amano said he “cannot be too optimistic” about a breakthrough: “We have been making our best efforts in a constructive spirit to work out an agreement between Iran and IAEA, but so far we have not been successful in reaching agreement. I have no indication this will change very soon.”
This at a time when Iran has been upping uranium enrichment to over 20 percent while activating hundreds more centrifuges; the latest U.S. National Intelligence Estimate says “Iran has made surprising, notable progress in the research and development of key components of its military nuclear program”; a senior Israeli official “has said Iran has made significant progress in assembling a nuclear warhead”; and the new NIE further states that Iran has “boosted its efforts to attach a nuclear warhead to ballistic missiles.”
So it appears that—as with the economic sanctions—when it comes to Iran’s nuclear program, that vaunted international community just isn’t coming through.
Tehran, for its part, was in a celebratory mood for its annual Jerusalem Day last Friday. With the usual crowds chanting “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!,” the Israeli Foreign Ministry listed some especially high-decibel statements by Iranian leaders.
They include, from President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: “You want a new Middle East? We do too, but in the new Middle East…there will be no trace of the American presence and the Zionists.” “The International Quds [Jerusalem] Day is the day of unity among all human beings to remove the Zionist black stain from the human society.” “Anyone who loves freedom and justice must strive for the annihilation of the Zionist regime in order to pave the way for world justice and freedom.” “The Zionist regime and the Zionists are a cancerous tumor….”
From Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei: “…liberating Palestine from the grip of Israel and its allies is a religious duty for all Muslims across the world.” “…the fake Zionist regime will soon fade away from geography….”
General Amir Ali Hajizadeh: “…if the Zionist hooligans embark on practicing their verbal threats, they will provide the best opportunity for the destruction of Israel because then the forged regime will be wiped out of the map and thrown into the trash bin of history for ever.”
All this after the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and China have been holding high-level diplomatic talks with Iran for months, with Obama insisting throughout his presidency—to this very day—that “engaging” Iran is the right, fruitful approach.
Any penalization of Iran for its ongoing incitement of the genocide of the Israeli people—illegal under the United Nations’ Genocide Convention, which lists “Direct and public incitement to commit genocide” as a punishable offense?
Apart from some mild rebukes by Washington and others, none at all. In fact, from August 26-31, Tehran will, as mentioned, be hosting the Non-Aligned Movement, which with 120 members comprises almost two-thirds of the countries of the world.
Israel is particularly upset that UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is planning to attend. So is Egypt’s new Muslim Brotherhood president Mohamed Morsi—the first visit to Iran by an Egyptian head of state since the 1979 takeover by the ayatollahs.
On Thursday it was reported that in Lebanon this week Iran’s ally Hizbullah held its largest-ever military exercise—which can only be seen as preparation for a possible imminent war between Israel on one side and Iran and its proxies on the other.
All Israelis, of course, would prefer that events did not take this course, and that instead the U.S.-led international community would be shouldering its own responsibility and dealing seriously with the Iranian threat. But those Israelis who count on the nations of the world to effectively confront a threat to the Jews and to themselves are blind both to history and what can readily be seen in the present.
P. David Hornik is a freelance writer and translator in Beersheva, Israel. He blogs at http://pdavidhornik.typepad.com.
Updates throughout the day at http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com. If you enjoy "Love of the Land", please be a subscriber. Just put your email address in the "Subscribe" box on the upper right-hand corner of the page.Twitter updates at LoveoftheLand as well as our Love of the Land page at Facebook.